The grounds for the President's decision were not sufficient to establish research misconduct. The transitional provisions between the RI Guidelines had been interpreted incorrectly (TENK 2023:5) 6.6.2024
Fabrication and disregard for good scientific practice, and shortcomings in the investigative process for good scientific practice 28.5.2021
There was no need to investigate an allegation regarding a Master’s thesis dating back over 20 years (TENK 2020:12) 27.5.2021
Making an RCR allegation public during the process did not constitute disregard for the responsible conduct of research (TENK 2020:10) 27.5.2021
Conflict of interest, malicious accusations and international cooperation in the RCR process (TENK 2020:8) 27.5.2021
University acted in accordance with the RCR guidelines by sending the final report only to the funder (TENK 2020:5) 27.5.2021
Authorship rights to a researcher who worked in a research group and was dismissed from a company, and the failure to start a preliminary investigation 25.3.2021
Opposing RCR allegations cannot be consolidated into one RCR process. An employer’s attempt at conciliation was not a form of pressuring 25.3.2021
